### Illustrative presentation of some basic concepts of network internal reliability with a focus on engineering surveys

#### Abstract

The paper integrates some earlier and the recent findings of the author in the area of network internal reliability and presents a consistent system of concepts in this respect. The concepts of outlier detection and outlier identification linked directly with the global model test and the outlier tests respectively, are shown as a basis for the concepts such as outlier detectability and outlier identifiability. Also, a four level classification of gross errors expressed in a form of a tree-diagram is presented including perceptible and imperceptible errors, detectable and undetectable errors and identifiable and unidentifiable errors. Their properties are given mainly in a descriptive way, deliberately limiting rigorous mathematical formulas to a necessary minimum. Understanding of different types of gross errors is useful in analyzing the results of the outlier detection and identification procedures as well as in designing the networks to make them duly robust to observation gross errors. It is of special importance for engineering surveys where quite often low-redundancy networks are used. Main objective of the paper is to demonstrate a clear and consistent system of basic concepts related to network internal reliability.

#### Keywords

#### Full Text:

PDF#### References

Baarda, W. (1968). A testing procedure for use in geodetic networks. Publications on Geodesy, New Series, vol.2, no.5, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft

Förstner, W. (1983). Reliability and discernability of extended Gauss-Markov models. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe A, No. 98, Munchen

Hawkins, D. M. (1980). Identification of outliers. Chapman and Hall, New York

Knight, N. L., Wang, J. & Rizos, C. (2010). Generalised measures of reliability for multiple outliers. J Geod., DOI. 10.1007/s00190-010-0392-4

Prószyński, W. (2008). The vector space of imperceptible observation errors: a supplement to the theory of network reliability. Geodesy and Cartography; vol. 57, No.1, pp. 3-19

Prószyński, W. (2010). Another approach to reliability measures for systems with correlated observations. J Geod 84: pp. 547-556

Prószyński, W. (2015). Revisiting Baarda’s concept of minimal detectable bias with regard to outlier identifiability. J Geod 89: pp. 993-1003

Schaffrin, B. (1997). Reliability measures for correlated observations. J. Surv. Eng., 123 (3), pp. 126-137

Teunissen, P. J. G. (1990). Quality control in integrated navigation systems. IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag 5(7), pp. 35-41

Teunissen, P. J. G. (1998). Minimal detectable biases of GPS data. J Geod 72: pp. 236–244.

Teunissen, P. J. G. (2000). Testing theory: an introduction. Delft University Press, Delft

Wang, J. & Chen, Y. (1994). On the reliability measure of observations. Acta Geodaet. et Cartograph. Sinica, English Edition, pp. 42-51

Wang, J. & Knight, N. (2012). New Outlier Separability Test and Its Application in GNSS Positioning. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 11(1), pp. 46-57

Yang, L., Wang, J., Knight, N. & Shen, Y. (2013). Outlier Separability Analysis with a Multiple Alternative Hypotheses Test. J Geod 87(6), pp. 591-604

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rgg-2016-0021

### Refbacks

- There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © **Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics** 2014-2018, e-mail: reports.geodesy@gmail.com

eISSN: **2391-8152**